Are Tents Adequate Shelters For Disaster Recovery?
Posted: Thursday, August 27, 2009
by Richard Grabowski
IADDIC Shelters
I do not believe so. I believe there was a time when tents were adequate: in the past. The problem I have is failing to understand how, in this modern age, we can have so many people who do not have adequate shelter in our world. With new technology and material, vast global distribution networks, large numbers of available resources (workers) in developing countries, and trillion dollar economies we haven't been able to figure out how to get millions or rather hundreds of millions of people sheltered in an adequate structure.
So what is wrong? Well the truth is many things: politics, money, war, disasters, property rights, and more each play a role in a person's ability to acquire adequate shelter. However I have another problem not often spoken about. People who are caught in the encumbrances of disaster and conflict often receive shelter from the U.N., Government Agencies like USAID, and large NGO's like the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC); but have you seen what gets passed out? People caught in unfortunate and often desperate situations are given blue plastic tarps and tents.
You may ask what is wrong with that and offer what appears to be a valid argument; we can't afford to just give these folks a new house. I counter that it is not as cut and dry as that. You see, I believe these things have a place for a very short term time period. But let's face it; it takes decades to reconstruct cities and countries. Just look at New Orleans as an example. In the most developed country in the world it will take a decade or more before she is back to a size and shape she was in before the hurricane landed upon her. Now, if it takes a decade in the United States , how long in a developing country. The real answer is many decades and sometimes never.
So by effectively delivering tents we subjugate the recipient to decades of desperate living conditions without adequate shelter. Further to this, the tents only last a year or two at best so they need to be re-issued or worse yet, when not re-issued people are left exposed and vulnerable for a long time.
The costs then mount, the logistics of redistribution of humanitarian goods and services continues, health deteriorates, education suffers, and the downward spiral effectively cripples a group of people. And this cost does reach you; after all, you pay taxes and some of the taxes go toward disaster relief internationally and you pay dues to the United Nations.
So there has to be a better way and that way is to deliver a core infrastructure housing module. Not an entire house but a sturdy module that can be delivered at the time of a disaster and serve as a simple shelter but built upon by the recipient as the people in an area recover from the disaster.
What this does is essentially stops the process of throwing money at programs for decades while trying to recover from a disaster. People have a decent, sturdy, warm, protected shelter very shortly after the disaster in which they can begin to recover and add to the unit as time and money allow. And if they are never able to build upon the unit then they have at lease received a simple shelter and are not left unsheltered for decades.
So are there shelters out there that can facilitate this without breaking the bank? We believe so and we believe IADDIC Shelter, LLC has just such a product. They manufacture a semi rigid foam shelter that is folded and placed in a bag for economical shipping. The shelter requires no assembly and only minor finishing when sent to the disaster. They say the shelter can be set up in less than an hour and lasts for decades.
It appears to me that this is an ideal solution to eliminate tents as a solution for housing. Further it is in line with the U.N.'s stated resolutions proclaiming adequate shelter for all. I am certain a claim can be made that even the IADDIC shelter is not adequate and for most people in the developed world this is true, however; if you happen to be one of those people living in the developing world then this is an improvement above everything being used today.
This Article has been viewed 472 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)Excellent article.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.